[BAT] bsd-airtools

Tim Kornau
Sun, 28 Apr 2002 15:10:34 +0200


--Dxnq1zWXvFF0Q93v
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

Hi Rob

i am picking up the thread on the bsd-airtools mailing list
 where RenderMan had this strange error on his wireless device
 " error: unable to ioctl device socket: Invalid argument "
 i am now experiencing the same error on my laptop i have attached 
my dmesg autput as well as the install.log of the source-mods 
.i am right now using obsd 3.1 with an orinocco Silver Lucent card .

Tim  
-- 
Tim Kornau

<>

39A4 9174 DBD3 E6AC 14B9  F4E5 CCFD 76F2 444C 6210

--Dxnq1zWXvFF0Q93v
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="dmesg.output"

display0: screen 1-5 added (80x25, vt100 emulation)
pcib0 at pci0 dev 7 function 0 "Intel 82371AB PIIX4 ISA" rev 0x02
pciide0 at pci0 dev 7 function 1 "Intel 82371AB IDE" rev 0x01: DMA, channel 0 wired to compatibility, channel 1 wired to compatibility
wd0 at pciide0 channel 0 drive 0: <TOSHIBA MK1214GAP>
wd0: 16-sector PIO, LBA, 11513MB, 16383 cyl, 16 head, 63 sec, 23579136 sectors
wd0(pciide0:0:0): using PIO mode 4, Ultra-DMA mode 2
uhci0 at pci0 dev 7 function 2 "Intel 82371AB USB" rev 0x01: irq 10
usb0 at uhci0: USB revision 1.0
uhub0 at usb0
uhub0: vendor 0x0000 UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1
uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered
"Intel 82371AB Power Mgmt" rev 0x03 at pci0 dev 7 function 3 not configured
cbb0 at pci0 dev 10 function 0 "Texas Instruments PCI1420 PCI-CardBus" rev 0x00: irq 10
cbb1 at pci0 dev 10 function 1 "Texas Instruments PCI1420 PCI-CardBus" rev 0x00: irq 10
xl0 at pci0 dev 11 function 0 "3Com 3c556 100Base-TX" rev 0x10: irq 10 address 00:00:86:46:df:b0
ukphy0 at xl0 phy 0: Generic IEEE 802.3u media interface
ukphy0: OUI 0x00c000, model 0x0000, rev. 0
xl0: selecting half duplex
"3Com Mini-PCI V.90 Modem" rev 0x10 at pci0 dev 11 function 1 not configured
esa0 at pci0 dev 13 function 0 "ESS Maestro 3" rev 0x00: "ESS Maestro 3" rev 0x00 (rev. 0x00)
esa0: interrupting at irq 5
ac97: codec id 0x83847609 (SigmaTel STAC9721/23)
ac97: codec features 18 bit DAC, 18 bit ADC, SigmaTel 3D
audio0 at esa0
isa0 at pcib0
isadma0 at isa0
pckbc0 at isa0 port 0x60/5
pckbd0 at pckbc0 (kbd slot)
pckbc0: using irq 1 for kbd slot
wskbd0 at pckbd0: console keyboard, using wsdisplay0
pms0 at pckbc0 (aux slot)
pckbc0: using irq 12 for aux slot
wsmouse0 at pms0 mux 0
pcppi0 at isa0 port 0x61
midi0 at pcppi0: <PC speaker>
sysbeep0 at pcppi0
lpt0 at isa0 port 0x378/4 irq 7
npx0 at isa0 port 0xf0/16: using exception 16
pccom0 at isa0 port 0x3f8/8 irq 4: ns16550a, 16 byte fifo
pccom1 at isa0 port 0x2f8/8 irq 3: ns16550a, 16 byte fifo
fdc0 at isa0 port 0x3f0/6 irq 6 drq 2
fd0 at fdc0 drive 0: 1.44MB 80 cyl, 2 head, 18 sec
cardslot0 at cbb0 slot 0 flags 0
cardbus0 at cardslot0: bus 2 device 0 cacheline 0x0, lattimer 0x20
pcmcia0 at cardslot0
cardslot1 at cbb1 slot 1 flags 0
cardbus1 at cardslot1: bus 3 device 0 cacheline 0x0, lattimer 0x20
pcmcia1 at cardslot1
biomask 4440 netmask 4440 ttymask 54c2
pctr: 686-class user-level performance counters enabled
mtrr: Pentium Pro MTRR support
dkcsum: wd0 matched BIOS disk 80
root on wd0a
rootdev=0x0 rrootdev=0x300 rawdev=0x302
wi0 at pcmcia1 function 0 "Lucent Technologies, WaveLAN/IEEE, Version 01.01"
wi0: Firmware 6.6 variant 1, address 00:02:2d:0e:68:80

--Dxnq1zWXvFF0Q93v
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="install.log"

Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- src/sys/dev/ic/if_wi.c.orig     Fri Apr 19 07:55:44 2002
|+++ src/sys/dev/ic/if_wi.c      Fri Apr 19 08:01:02 2002
--------------------------
Patching file sys/dev/ic/if_wi.c using Plan A...
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assume -R? [y] 
Hunk #1 succeeded at 101.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 142.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 165.
Hunk #4 succeeded at 462.
Hunk #5 succeeded at 470.
Hunk #6 succeeded at 599.
Hunk #7 succeeded at 643.
Hunk #8 succeeded at 669.
Hunk #9 succeeded at 695.
Hunk #10 succeeded at 709.
Hunk #11 succeeded at 751.
Hunk #12 succeeded at 822.
Hunk #13 succeeded at 996.
Hunk #14 succeeded at 1114.
Hunk #15 succeeded at 1312.
Hunk #16 succeeded at 1392.
Hunk #17 succeeded at 1405.
Hunk #18 succeeded at 1442.
Hunk #19 succeeded at 1450.
Hunk #20 succeeded at 1634.
Hunk #21 succeeded at 1937.
Hunk #22 succeeded at 1982.
Hunk #23 succeeded at 2007.
Hunk #24 succeeded at 2445.
Hmm...  The next patch looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- src/sys/dev/ic/if_wivar.h.orig  Fri Apr 19 07:55:50 2002
|+++ src/sys/dev/ic/if_wivar.h   Fri Apr 19 07:55:55 2002
--------------------------
Patching file sys/dev/ic/if_wivar.h using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 51.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 73.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 89.
done
Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- src/sbin/wicontrol/wicontrol.c.orig     Tue Apr 16 23:37:27 2002
|+++ src/sbin/wicontrol/wicontrol.c      Wed Apr 17 00:31:00 2002
--------------------------
Patching file sbin/wicontrol/wicontrol.c using Plan A...
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assume -R? [y] 
Hunk #1 succeeded at 55.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 82.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 471.
Hunk #4 succeeded at 496.
Hunk #5 succeeded at 722.
Hunk #6 succeeded at 758.
Hunk #7 succeeded at 774.
Hunk #8 succeeded at 785.
Hunk #9 succeeded at 806.
Hunk #10 succeeded at 832.
done
rm -f a.out [Ee]rrs mklog core *.core  wicontrol wicontrol.o  wicontrol.ln 
cc -O2   -Wall   -c wicontrol.c
cc  -static -o wicontrol wicontrol.o 
install -c -s -o root -g bin  -m 555 wicontrol /sbin
install -c -o root -g bin -m 444 wicontrol.cat8 /usr/share/man/cat8/wicontrol.0

--Dxnq1zWXvFF0Q93v--